I agree. But I also think sexually shaming her is gross. Sheâs a good journalist and sheâs going to pay a huge price already.
Point of fact, she's a godawful journalist who admires Ann Coulter
"she's a good journalist" [citation needed]
No one is shaming her for having sex they are shaming her for being a journalist and fucking a person she was covering without disclosing it which is baseline. You are moving the goal post and pretending it's feminism. This is sexism with a prettier coat of paint. Women can be responsible.
She wrote the following paragraph about Biden, while apparently in a secret relationship of some kind with a candidate running against him. - "Something not of this world" - His face is "low trust" That's rank hackery, and the fact that she was in a secret relationship with his opponent...
Really curious how you can call a thirty one year old woman who knowingly violated one of the most basic principles of her profession, *repeatedly* from what it sounds like, âgood at her job.â
Just tell us what you didâŚ
I'm pretty sure good journalists don't continue to write articles when there is a clear and obvious conflict of interest? Like.. that seems pretty high up in the definition of Not Good Journalism.
It's not the sex she's being shamed for, though. She's being shamed for concealing a conflict of interest that casts serious doubts on her reporting.
A good journalist doesnât fuck a source. Hope this helps!
hmm she's pretty racist, was buddies with Milo, and is an Ann Coulter superfan. rfk's entire campaign was a ratfuck for trump, and she gushed over him in a NYMag profile. honestly fuck her đ¤ˇââď¸