New recording by Salt Lake City band Hoofless “Get In”. This song is so good open.spotify.com/track/6DbLgT...
Listen to Get In on Spotify. Song · Hoofless · 2024
If scientists disagree about conclusions or analyses while doing research and writing a paper, should they hide it to tell a better story to the public? No… www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...@nicholascoles.bsky.social@jasonchin.bsky.social@roseodea.bsky.social@alexh.bsky.social
If the field moves more to open or transparent peer review, certain groups may systematically receive harsher reviews, or biased and embarrassing comments from reviewers, and public seeing that uncritically is problematic. Along with openness we need metascience, post pub convo, and accountability
There is increasing interest in openness in peer review. But to ensure equity, diversity, and inclusion, we need to ask critical questions: Who is being asked to be “open” and at what cost? How should we promote openness and transparency without exacerbating inequities? Check out our post below!
Our work engages with editors, reviewers, and authors to create cultural shifts in scientific peer review to foster diversity, equity, and inclusion in psychology and neuroscience. As peer review prac...
“I don’t want to move to Toronto” 🎵🎶🎤 sing it @mattarbogast open.spotify.com/track/65fpaJ...
Loose Collars · Song · 2024
The 3Ps: The 1st P in deciding which project to work on is People. Work with people you like who use good research practices. The 2nd is passion. The topic should be worthwhile. The 3rd is publishable (used to be p-value). Work on projects with solid data/results. www.nature.com/articles/d41...
Stuck between several lines of research? Here’s how we decide which ones to pursue, say Elizabeth Tenney, Jacqueline Chen and McKenzie Preston. Stuck between several lines of research? Here’s how we d...
I’m a fan of trying to quantify how often reviewers & editors check authors’ preregistrations (eg, by @syeducation.bsky.social), but also we should not forget that reviewers fail to check for deviations from a priori plans in 100% of unpreregistered studies. Because they can’t.
Was trying to tell a friend about Bluesky, said what do you do that’s cool we can look it up. He said golf. No results found for #tigerwoods. How does this thing work? Is this the first discussion about Tiger?
Some Data Indicating that Editors and Reviewers Do Not Check Preregistrations during the Review Process: http://osf.io/nh7qw/