There's a bit of talk about why 1% FDR and maybe we shouldn't subscribe so religiously to 1%. A collectively cosigned letter making it clear that >1% FDR can be perfectly fine, depending on what's happening post-processing with that list.

Much discussion today around mass spectrometry (proteomics) data repositories/big data/metadata. As a data generator, it seems like a bigger and bigger burden being asked of data generators by the data consumers, without much incentive for the generators.

Is this like when all the statisticians got together and said “stop thinking p<0.05 is law”! What about razor peptides? Maybe some sort of conditional acceptance based on proteotypicity?