IMO it's a bad decision and I'm 100% sure they'll try in the next few years, but worth noting they didn't question her constitutional right to get married in the decision, but the right to bring a noncitizen spouse into the country, which is more narrow than the question raised in Kerry v. Din.

True, but they aren't going to overturn Obergefell by banning same-sex marriage. They'll use identical language that states determining marriage eligibility is deeply rooted in tradition and gay marriage isn't, and that a state's "generosity" in permitting it doesn't require recognition elsewhere.