Oh, they funded Hamas alright. youtu.be/o7grSsuFSS0?...web.archive.org/web/20151207...
I don't actually care who the illegal settlers are. The problem is that they are. And that they have a purpose of denying Palestinians any state and anything like full citizen's rights within Israel. www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a...
But the cost in children's lives is acceptable to you? The hatred it will create among Palestinians, too? Israel funded Hamas to make it to what is it - problematic? And - yes, Hamas should be seen as terrorists for what they did. But that should not rule out criticism when Israel does wrong.
But is it?
The cruelty is the point, clearly 🤷♂️
ProPublica reviewed 12 of the nation’s strictest abortion bans. Few changed in 2023, as state lawmakers caved to pressure from anti-abortion groups opposing exceptions for rape, incest and health risks. www.propublica.org/article/abor...
ProPublica reviewed 12 of the nation’s strictest abortion bans. Few changed in 2023, as state lawmakers caved to pressure from anti-abortion groups opposing exceptions for rape, incest and health ri...
It also makes it quite surreal that Israel actually funded and supported Hamas' way to power - in order to play divide and conquer as they wanted a religious balance to more secular PLO. 🤷🏼♂️😳
Ok, it's over from the "other platform". But how would you describe the increasing Israeli cleansing of other areas while all eyes are on the West Bank? Settling in the West Bank and Hebron is just continuing and continuing. x.com/YehudaShaul/...
Are you trying to say that rights have to have a divine origin? Nah, not seriously? And if so - would any of the world's approx. 3,000 known deities be acceptable to issue them?
Well, after 1967 when Israel took over and kept Gaza and the West Bank, a unanimous UN resolution called for Israel to leave the occupied territories. Did it ever? And if not, isn't Israel actually by definition an occupying force?
No, not meaningless. Insufficient, perhaps.