NYTimes again scraping the bottom of the barrel to publish someone, anyone, with a pro-Trump argument, no matter how absurd the argument is, no matter how little credibility the author has, or whether the author already has their own billionaire-subsidized platform.
Does the NYT start with a headline then solicit a story that sorta kinda fits, lies and exaggeration ok?
Of course, if you read the article, he's suggesting sabotaging Harris's character, not any virtue of Trump.
This is pretty clearly clickbait trolling on the part of the NYT. Hard pass on even looking at this based on the headline alone. I'm tired of falling for their hate-read gambits.
I think Mr Lowry overestimates the size of the sociopath vote.
Glad I dropped my subscription. They've pretty much hit rock bottom.
Trump only wins on character if the lack thereof gets him votes.
why was the writer of this headline allowed to do write this? I don’t think the op-ed writer would say Trump’s moral character is superior, which is what the headline implies. I am sure I am not 1st one to say this, but NYT should register as a utility if it is going to gaslight us this much.
Can you actually link to the piece itself? 🤔 Archive link as well: archive.ph/Ym0lO
Presidential races are won and lost on character as much as the issues, and often the issues are proxies for character.
Five minutes of your life wasted, gone and never to return
Good ol' Sparklepants Lowry. Excellent judge of character.Good ol' Sparklepants Lowry. Excellent judge of character.