A month ago, NYT/Siena had Trump +2 nationally. I complained sample sizes were too small for several groups, and that younger voters are more than 12% of electorate in Presidential elections. Today their sample sizes are fine and they bumped young voters to 13%, so Harris is +3.

So needling the NYT... actually works?

This poll’s reputation is pretty right-leaning, isn’t it? So it would likely be on the low end of Harris’ range of polls?

And oversampled PoC.

They sure are talking to a lot of post-grads. I know it's weighted, but come'on. Maybe call fewer PhDs and JDs and such.