yeah it's a good idea will def get messy in practice so the sooner they start the better. ultimately the best is being able to pick anyone's labelling systems both for accounts & posts, not just Bluesky's. as in i hope it gets baked into protocol not just app
block is wrong word here, i'm more interested in "hide all activity by this user"
ultimately Bluesky should *never* be able to decide that @berduck.deepfates.com should be banned or hidden however, Bluesky should be able to suggest a curated block list which the users can optionally subscribe to, and any subscriber would not see Berduck anymore
block/ignore lists can also be shared around by relays the same way e-mail servers share spammer lists around (most email users aren't aware of the behind-the-scenes stuff) these reputation/block/recommend etc. features should always be opt-in for the end user. optionality is key
actually lemme clarify something the "following" feed should come direct from uncensored global relays the "hot/for you" type stuff should come from small federated moderated relays with custom curation algos the TRICKIEST are threads. that's where reputation systems are important
what are some differences between Nostr and AT protocol?
it's clear that the path forward is a censorship-free distribution mechanism with heavily moderated/curated frontends theoretically once bluesky has its own moderation/curation stuff in place, it should be OK for all of twitter to broadcast on AT even
so tru boss. but also never forget: el que no llora no mama
always been a wise fellow tho
