This is acceding to an “alternative facts” universe that we all need to reject. If news orgs want to argue that they are covering the news to the best of their ability, they need to be able to provide fact checks to the best of their ability. Letting the candidates do this is a recipe for disaster.
CBS News says it will be up to the candidates, not the moderators, to fact-check each other.
A gift to gish-gallopers everywhere
Vance is basically going to straw man his way through the debate: accuse Walz of positions he doesn’t hold and then force him to defend them. The whole thing is going to be a shitshow.
When it's over, Scott Jennings will dominate the post debate analysis on CNN with free reign to interrupt any fact-checking and interject with bogus trumpytrump insights whenever the dialog bruises his candidate.
"see bs news"