idk how AU courts handle that kind of questioning but it's plainly obvious outside the courtroom that Karl is 100% an irredeemable cunt playing team sports on who can and cannot be an unfathomable dickhead.

and really if Karl can bring random YouTubers as witnesses to say "people always hated Billy" Billy could easily have gone "please explain your definition of evil as you allow it"

I can't speak to anything other than AU courts but I think that the lawyers *could* ask about Karl's standards for "evil", but wouldn't be able to bring up the rwhitegoose stuff if it wasn't already part of the evidence, and even then they'd have to establish a connection to the Mitchell matterI can't speak to anything other than AU courts but I think that the lawyers *could* ask about Karl's standards for "evil", but wouldn't be able to bring up the rwhitegoose stuff if it wasn't already part of the evidence, and even then they'd have to establish a connection to the Mitchell matter