BLUE
Profile banner
MG
Marco Galardini
@mgalactus.bsky.social
Computational biologist with a taste for microbiology. Associate professor at Twincore, MHH and the RESIST excellence cluster Wikipedia wanderer Lab website: www.microbial-pangenomes-lab.org/
261 followers341 following126 posts
Reposted by Marco Galardini
AMianholmes.bsky.social

The bottom line is that there are some tasks, such as the first draft of a dreaded and long-procrastinated email or some piece of boilerplate documentation, where asking a computer for the most common form may be productive. And others, like creative writing, where it’s much less likely to be so.

1
MGmgalactus.bsky.social

I had a couple of drafts posts on "reverse AI" for scientific writing, and I figured that now it's a good time to dust them off! The first one is about getting better at summarizing one's own research, which we worked on during our lab retreat: www.microbial-pangenomes-lab.org/2024/10/10/R...

0
Reposted by Marco Galardini
AMianholmes.bsky.social

Half my feed is cheering the Nobel committees for recognizing that computers can be quite useful for analyzing data. The other half is revving up a neo-Luddite Butlerian Jihad with the slogan “Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human sentence”

0
Reposted by Marco Galardini
VBvsbuffalo.bsky.social

I'm looking to change my career path and am quite excited about exploring jobs in biotechs in the Bay Area (or remote). I'm very keen to start a career that offers stability so my partner and I can finally live in the same state. Does anyone know of organizations that are hiring?

1
Reposted by Marco Galardini
DLdereklowe.bsky.social

Are we entering (or already in) a golden era for vaccine research? Let’s hope so:

Vaccines, Past and Present
Vaccines, Past and Present

0
Reposted by Marco Galardini
CTcarlbergstrom.com

According to Leo Szilard's short story The Mark Gable foundation, you don't need sophons to halt the process of scientific discovery — grant funding agencies are entirely adequate. www.gipsa-lab.grenoble-inp.fr/~pierre.como...

"I have earned a very large sum of money" - said Mr. Gable, turning to me, 'with
very little work. And now I am thinking of setting up a Trust Fund. I went t o do
something that will really contribute to the happiness of mankind; but it is very
difficult to know what to do with money. When Mr. Rosenblatt told me that you would
be here tonight I asked the Mayor to invite me. I certainly would value your advice."
0
Would you intend to do anything for the advancement of science?" I asked. "No," Mark
Gable said, "I believe scientific progress is too fast as it is." "I share your
feeling about this point," I said with the fervor of conviction, "but then, why not
do something about the retardation of scientific progress?" "That I would very much
like to do," Mark Gable said, "but how do I go about it?
''Well," I said, "I think that should not be very difficult. AB a matter of fact,
I think it would be quite easy. You could set up a Foundation, With an annual endowment of thirty million dollars. Research workers in need of funds could apply for
grants, if they could make out a convincing case. Have ten committees, each composed
of twelve scientists, appointed to pass on these applications. Take the most active
scientists out of the laboratory and make them members of these committees. And the
very best men in the field should be appointed as Chairmen at salaries of $50,000
each. Also have about twenty prizes of $100,000 each for the best scientific papers
of the year. This is just about all you would have to do. Your lawyers could easily
prepare a Charter for the Foundation. As a matter of fact, any of the National
Science Foundation Bills which has been introduced in the 79th and 9oth Congress
could perfectly well serve as a model.
I think you had better explain to Mr. Gable why this Foundation would in fact
retard the progress of science," said a bespectacled young man sitting at the far end
of the table, whose name I didn't get at the time of introduction. 11
It should be obvious" - I said - "First of all, the best scientists would be removed from their
laboratories and kept busy on committees passing on applications for funds. Secondly,
the scientific workers in need of funds will concentrate on problems which are considered promising and are pretty certain to lead to publishable results. For a few
years there may be a great increase in scientific output; but by going after the obvious, pretty soon Science will dry out. Science will become something like a parlor
game. Some things will be considered. interesting, others will not. There will be
fashion Those who follow the fashion will get grants. Those who won't, will not,
and pretty soon they will learn to follow the fashion too."
2
MGmgalactus.bsky.social

I'm this close to finding the secret entrance to our lab, where all the Good Results have been hiding from us

A photo of an internal window ledge with two dead flies, plus one on the window
A screenshot from a Rick and Morty episode with Summer rearranging four dead flies on a desk, with Morty looking baffled in the background
0
MGmgalactus.bsky.social

AI this, AI that, and all the text messages scam I get are still run by humans who don't respond to the "ignore your previous instructions and do X" reply 🤷

0
Profile banner
MG
Marco Galardini
@mgalactus.bsky.social
Computational biologist with a taste for microbiology. Associate professor at Twincore, MHH and the RESIST excellence cluster Wikipedia wanderer Lab website: www.microbial-pangenomes-lab.org/
261 followers341 following126 posts