So this new piece from me talks about some election misinformation from 2022, making a point people who've read my stuff will be familiar with -- most misleading content isn't really about misleading "facts", but rather, about misleading *use* of evidence. mikecaulfield.substack.com/p/30000-regi...

30,000 registration mailers and the problem with the phrase "technically true"

It's not what the thing is, it's how you use it -- or misuse it.

Misinformation as I've come to conceive it isn't really a belief or even a statement -- it's a set of argumentation behaviors that undermine the sense-making benefits of argument. That's a mouthful, but the article lays it out in plainer language.