Yes. Largely, yes. And I suppose you could define "winning" as convincing more people to back you than the opponent did. Therefore moving the vote in your direction. But that's not the context most articles I've seen are looking at the value of the arguments, rather than the result on voters.

I also think that you should debate to persuade, but that's a goal, and usually an unrealistic one. Especially in modern debate. Besides, if your goal in a debate is solely to win, you shut off the potential to learn from the other side in a constructive way.

Ya know, 2 minutes ago, I posted that I hadn't disagreed with anything starmer had done yet that I'd heard of. Immediately after I find something I disagree with so, fuck me ig.

Fair enough. It's a shame that he hasn't done more so far, but from what I've read (which is far from everything) I haven't disagreed with him yet.

Must be why he renamed it 😂

What specifically? Out of interest

I always hope that such people will, eventually, change. There's no guarantee, but it is the moral thing to try. At least in my opinion.

Nw good luck have fun!!

Another programmer on this app showed me a piece of software called construct3, makes making games suuuuuuuuper easy. Give it a go! See what you think!

Cool idea, looks fun, I will say though, the art style looks cool but the art for the front page looks cartoony in a way which put me off initially. Until I watched the trailer. The image kiiiiiinda looks like a breath of the wild clone? Idk, just something to consider.