"Turnover" of the claim would not mean that the Court would order Trump to pay Giuliani $2 million. Turnover would mean that the bankruptcy creditors (Freeman & Moss) could assert the claim against Trump as if they were Giuliani.

Ugh, shoot, I should have double-checked that! I know sometimes turnover proceedings involve the court ordering third parties to pay creditors, but I shouldn't have assumed that was what was happening here. Will delete or append a correction. Very much appreciate your setting me straight!