🙋🏼♀️ If only our core group of ten journalists, editors, artists, and media-makers with 120+ years of combined experience receive enough funding to launch our fearless feminist newsroom by Election Day… www.kickstarter.com/projects/and...
Worker-Owned, Reader-Supported Intersectional Feminist Journalism to Unfuck Your Algorithm
It's not something important like the president's age so why should voters care whether or not one candidate will kill a bunch of people to get his way 🤔
They say "voters may not care" but the truth is that people very much care, but a whole lot of people care in an "I absolutely think I have a right to overthrow the government if I don't get my way" tantrum sort of way.
Literally no one cares
That article is, in fact, meant to influence public perception. The intent is to give people permission to ignore the J6 facts and stories.
I think the bigger point is that those battle lines were drawn a long time ago.
I'm reluctant to take away anything real from debate focus groups of undecided voters on TV, but several of them did say they didn't like that Vance refused to say if he would certify the 2020 election. It seems to be what stood out about the whole VP debate.
EVERY TRUMP HEADLINE: “In commanding packed arena former (and future?) President Trump lays out populist economic agenda, putting Harris in bind” EVERY DEM HEADLINE: “Beleaguered Biden cures cancer while Trump strangles puppy, but studies show that life is meaningless & everyone hates Democrats”
They are very busy “just asking questions” about trans people and loudly obsessing over billionaires.