Valve's reverse Robin Hood approach, where games that make millions get a reduction of the cut they have to pay, is freaking ridiculous on paper But this puts it into perspective: it seems like it's just greed. If they were to extend it to small games they'd lose more money than the alternative

and frankly, "we make ungodly amounts of money almost nearly just by existing, but we don't want to sacrifice a chunk of it for the health of the ecosystem" is an extremely myopic approach