BLUE
MT
Michael Tae 🎃Spooky🎃
@mtsw.bsky.social
I cut film and tv @mtsw on Twitter and mastodon.social
22.7k followers1.8k following21.2k posts

SKsvenkoprek.bsky.social

But as we know, every amendment except for the second is just optional

0
Ggloomygus.bsky.social

It's constitutional for the President to add additional seats to the Supreme Court without congressional approval if the newly-packed Supreme Court says so.

0
Ponbluskysku.bsky.social

Not to be the rain on the parade dork but that isn’t in the constitution unless you already hold office (ofc Alito *does*)

0
DOmarieo.bsky.social

For some reason the Supreme Court has looked right past the insurrection clause in the constitution. Otherwise, we wouldn’t be at risk of another Trump Presidency.

0

Next you'll tell me that "The President has a free pass to break the law, in fact he is more omnipotent than post-Magna Carta royalty" isn't written in the Constitution either

0
Rbuckeyedpeas.bsky.social

as a phillies fan i desperately need biden to reclaim the mantle of Most Prominent Phillies Fan Politician, no reason the 2022 NL pennant can't be flying from the white house too

1
KRkurtrisser.bsky.social

SCOTUS judges cannot be trusted to faithfully uphold the PLAIN LANGUAGE of the Constitution. They have betrayed their country, and broken their oaths of office. The Supreme Court judges bring great shame to good citizens who once trusted them to truthfully uphold the Constitution.

0
Fferles.bsky.social

Yes, I would think that if you were a justice you would rule on what the constitution actually said. If you felt the insurrection clause was problematic in some way, you might argue that an amendment should be passed to deal with whatever issue it was, but until then, you follow the constitution

0
LTcrgibs.bsky.social

I maintain that Marbury v. Madison remains the most destructive SCOTUS decision of all time

0
MT
Michael Tae 🎃Spooky🎃
@mtsw.bsky.social
I cut film and tv @mtsw on Twitter and mastodon.social
22.7k followers1.8k following21.2k posts