the media wants you to think the ticket where the presidential candidate is married to a jew is anti-semitic and the one where both halves of the ticket have made repeated appearences with nazis is not anti-semitic. Do they do this to inform their audience? If not, what is the real purpose?
Oh look: Jamie Kirchick is making things up again. I wouldn't bother with this if I hadn't seen a lot of pieces making a similar argument: that not choosing Shapiro opens Democrats to charges of anti-semitism. I don't get this at all.
If having a “commitment” to Israel is a barrier to the Democratic presidential ticket, then it bodes ominously for future Jewish participation in Democratic Party politics.
Aside from his welcoming speech at the first Harris/Walz rally - which didn’t really mention this explicitly- has Shapironreleased any kind of statement condemning this accusation? (Serious question b/c if he has and it hasn’t been reported, another failure of media and if he hasn’t why not?)
and whose rhetoric led to the Tree of Life murders? We're all trying to find the guy who did *that*
Trump's first campaign for president was openly anti-semitic, and I don't think I've seen that mentioned once by anyone who claims to be concerned about antisemitism.
jamie kirchik, why am i still hearing this name. do the people clamor for made-up nothings and other irrelevancies
Has anyone asked Josh how he feels about all this crap going on? Anyone bother? These people are just cruel and mean and dirty and low with no integrity or morals.
LARPing a normal election?
It feels like several higher ups at the Times need Trump to be elected so he'll keep the Epstein files hidden.
Look at the woman, the Black man, and the Latino man that Trump passed up to nominate a whiter than white guy. Where’s all the op eds about that? Why didn’t Trump pick a Jewish running mate? Did he even have one on his list? Can they tag these op eds as in-kind donations to the Trump campaign?
They really are that weird
Citation needed please.