MT
Michael Tae 🎃Spooky🎃
@mtsw.bsky.social
I cut film and tv
@mtsw on Twitter and mastodon.social
23.2k followers1.9k following21.6k posts
Vote no on 33 IMHO. As written it allows a backdoor for NIMBY jurisdictions to exempt themselves from complying with state law around housing supply by passing rent control on new units so strict that no developer will build there
My humble opinion is that I think you got this one right.
Interesting. Here's an argument for it, they may be overly naive: www.theleaguesf.org/voter_guides...
Pissed Off Voter Guide
Archive of Pissed Off Voter Guides. We've been making voter guides for the last 20 San Francisco elections to help educate our friends and peers on the issues, excite pissed off progressive voters, an...
The urbanists at SPUR are also No on 33, and they give some useful background and pros & cons here: www.spur.org/voter-guide/...
Yes on 34 too
MT
Michael Tae 🎃Spooky🎃
@mtsw.bsky.social
I cut film and tv
@mtsw on Twitter and mastodon.social
23.2k followers1.9k following21.6k posts