In line with this, we find that the effect is concentrated: *among jurisdictions which became physically much larger (area) *where tax base volatility was reduced *on permits where there is a large fiscal upside

These results challenge the CW on whether local control drive the housing affordability crisis. At a minimum, our results have two implications. 1. Local control can *sometimes* lead to more housing. 2. Local control leads to more housing in DK by shaping city interest.