You'll want to review Vol.44, No.1 of Historical Reflections, a special issue tearing apart Pinker. He has never acknowledged the existence of this special issue, which mercilessly tears his thesis apart www.jstor.org/stable/e4850...

this is a really savage (and accurate) review of Pinker as well that has the added benefit of Pinker writing a pissy (and dumb) response reviews.history.ac.uk/review/1232

Already read it and interviewed Dwyer! Forgot to ask him whether medievalists get sick of their work being headlined "Getting Medieval on X" whenever it goes to a popular audience

And now I see I've said twice in a row that it tears his thesis apart, I've got semantic satiation going on now, I'm repeating myself, words are meaningless, I'm sorry