S230 works by immunizing cases even when the scienter requirement applies (which is the 1A standard). That means, even if a plaintiff pleads “info and belief” that the platform knew content was defamatory, the platform still wins on a MTD, when it would go to discovery and summary judgement under 1A

Also, to be clear, you’ve mostly convinced me that, even in a hypothetical manner, it’s not worth perusing. I’m just trying to clarify what I *was* proposing earlier