The candidate struggling to win over Latinos got 56% in the poll. The candidate holding his grip on Latinos got 37%. Already bad for NYT to treat one poll crosstab as the top story—and any shift of Latinos to the GOP isn't a non-story—but why frame the candidate 19 points ahead as the one trailing?

When Harris wins, can we do a purge at the NYT?

It's impossible to ask these questions without having the following option -because they want Trump to win for venal or ideological reasons -because Trump winning will be more fun to work with -because they're scared of him -

Well the credibility of the NYT is pretty much non-existent so I’d file this under fiction.

oh i think i know why they did that

Because they want Trump to win

Despicable, Beholden NYT

Yes, the NYT is trash. Watched the Telemundo town hall (thanks Midas Touch for the YouTube recommendation) and it was excellent. Respectful, intelligent, empathetic. It’s all translated so I recommend it as well.

37% of a group is quite a lot for a candidate whose offering to that group is 'mass internment'. I would also call 56% for the 'not mass internment' candidate rather low.

The purpose of a machine is what it does.