BLUE
Profile banner
OE
Olivia E. Atherton
@oliviaatherton.bsky.social
Assistant Professor at UC Riverside 📊 Research on Self-Regulation • Personality • Sociocultural Contexts • Mental and Physical Health • Lifespan Development • Aging srchlab.ucr.edu/
185 followers288 following7 posts

Awesome! Thanks for the shoutout, Andrew. And, good luck with the revision! If you have any feedback about what works and what doesn’t, we, of course, welcome any and all feedback ☺️

0
Reposted by Olivia E. Atherton
AFpsychscience.bsky.social

Emily C. Willroth of Washington University in St. Louis and @oliviaatherton.bsky.social of the University of Houston provide a new reporting framework for scientists who alter their research plan after preregistering a study.

When Things Don’t Go According to Plan
When Things Don’t Go According to Plan

Methodologists have embraced preregistration as a way to prevent questionable research practices and add transparency to scientific studies. But many researchers end up deviating from those preregiste...

0
Reposted by Olivia E. Atherton
TStedmond.bsky.social

The schedule is set and registration is live for the SPSP 2024 Personality Science Preconference, Feb 8th 8AM-noon (++ Happiness and Well-being Preconf. in the afternoon). Register here: spsp.org/events/annua.... Early bird registration ends in 1 month!

Personality science preconference schedule
0

involves a lot of work, time, and skill. I’m optimistic that change in the name of transparency and rigor is on the horizon ☺️

0

evaluate.) Of course, prereg itself is a skill to be honed (and research doesn’t always go according to plan), so deviations are expected. But, transparency is key. At the same time, all of that does not correct the past lit and like you mentioned, to fully evaluate adherence to prereg plans

1

Yes totally! The primary solution we suggest is for authors to fill out the standardized prereg deviations table (to be published along with article), and then AEs/reviewers can evaluate table during the review process to determine risk of bias. (And then future readers would have access to info to

1

(TLDR: not disclosing deviations will negatively impact editors perceptions of work and there’s notable variability in what types of deviations are considered major/minor or justifiable, at least among psychology journal editors).

0
Profile banner
OE
Olivia E. Atherton
@oliviaatherton.bsky.social
Assistant Professor at UC Riverside 📊 Research on Self-Regulation • Personality • Sociocultural Contexts • Mental and Physical Health • Lifespan Development • Aging srchlab.ucr.edu/
185 followers288 following7 posts