Scientific fraud has real costs and requires stricter monitoring, as well as a reevaluation of the reward system that encourages it.
From Alex Stapp on the other place www.vox.com/future-perfe... >cardiologist fakes data showing better outcomes for patients who were given beta blockers before heart surgery >Europe changes its medical guidelines based on this research > but beta blockers increase risk of death by 27%
From Don Poldersmans and Francesca Gino to faked Alzheimer’s data, the scientific field needs a better handle on allegations and consequences of fraudulent research.
I agree, though I think there are limits on reforms of the reward system. Studies that meet certain characteristics - surprising results, big effects, or something else - will always get more attention by scientists and the public and boost reputation and fame. 1/I agree, though I think there are limits on reforms of the reward system. Studies that meet certain characteristics - surprising results, big effects, or something else - will always get more attention by scientists and the public and boost reputation and fame. 1/