BLUE
Profile banner
I
Isthatyourdonkey?
@paulma.bsky.social
I’d hoped to grow a “Mohican”, but instead I grew older. Angry young man, now very angry older man. If I “block” you, it’s because I don’t have enough time left, to waste it conversing with idiots and clowns.
33 followers65 following82 posts
Reposted by Isthatyourdonkey?

So let me get this straight. 6 days into office Rachel Reeves refused permission for NAO to investigate England's 48 SEZs and 8 Freeports despite a House of common's April 2024 report citing lack of transparency, ignoring of the Nolan principles, and questions over value for taxpayers money. Thread

1
Reposted by Isthatyourdonkey?

Starmer's changed Labour Party's only interests lie in taking millions from corporate lobbyists, making up BS about a Tory blackhole while continuing with Sunak and Truss's 74 SEZs and 12 Freeports that will carve up the UK into tax havens with separate laws and regs from the host country.

1
Ipaulma.bsky.social

It’s wonder the British public are so woefully ill informed. Their primary source of information is a handful of corrupted MSM outlets, of which the BBC has by far the greatest reach Nothing “Changes” The lies aren’t even sophisticated Truth is, Isreal is mass murdering more innocent civilians.

0
Ipaulma.bsky.social

I’d like Gullis to teach my kids, like I’d like Netanyahu to be their child minder.

0
Ipaulma.bsky.social

What exactly, do you think is achieved by preventing people from peacefully protesting? Why would anyone think, a peacefully protester more odious than rapists? Who posses the greatest threat, a peaceful protester or a disingenuous Prime Minister?

0
Ipaulma.bsky.social

Are Robert Disingenuous and Kemi Badenough doing enough to ensure that the Conservative Party never get elected again, or is there more they can do?

0
Ipaulma.bsky.social

Perhaps we are impotent as individuals, but who knows what we might be capable of “collectively” What ver is certain and very clear, is that we cannot continue as we are For our “leaders” will destroy us all and the very plant we collectively occupy Ultimately, no “man” can afford be an island

0
Ipaulma.bsky.social

The fact that our “leaders” consider the slaughter of civilians & the wholesale destruction their property & lives, to be a reasonable & acceptable means of dispute resolution, puts into question, in its entirety, the value system they have established & which we, tacitly accept.

1
Profile banner
I
Isthatyourdonkey?
@paulma.bsky.social
I’d hoped to grow a “Mohican”, but instead I grew older. Angry young man, now very angry older man. If I “block” you, it’s because I don’t have enough time left, to waste it conversing with idiots and clowns.
33 followers65 following82 posts