If a journalist has been consistently reliable, resourceful and accurate when reporting things you want to hear, you don’t get to dismiss them when they report something you don’t. I’m sorry, I don’t make the rules. nymag.com/intelligence...
The president’s mental decline was like a dark family secret for many elite supporters.
So Peter, it turns out Olivia Nuzzi was having an undisclosed affair with RFK Jr, who was still in the race at the time, while reporting and writing this piece. Still standing by her reliability?
I get the mental decline. He's 80+. That should have been dealt with by the Democrats years ago. My question is why should that make me (or anyone) vote for Trump?
Pete, if you need a kaishakunin, I’m available.
have they
Hey buddy the good news is that I knew Nuzzi was a full of shit narcissist back then, but it was pretty funny to have it confirmed today
I am doing my part ... and furiously praying to every god that both of them die (PEACEFULLY, Y'ALL) before November.
Her transcript of what Trump said to her in the Kelly-related encounter with DFT and cabinet members has no positive journalistic attributes that I can detect. It seems intended to advance a career in access "journalism." People disagreeing is not "dunking on you." Reel in your ego.
I will vote 🔵 no matter who. However, #Biden#officialact powers - 😳😤which he clearly states he won't. Yes, change at this late date is risky, but so is "staying the course", 1 term loser GHW Bush's bland, ineffective strategy.
Have you thought about writing a retraction, clarification, or apology for this post?