Counterpoint, a LOT of the people who are praising the article (in some sort of "thinking" that has homogenized across the "group", if you will) are casually tossing out transphobia in their defense. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘩𝘦'𝘴 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮, 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘱𝘩𝘰𝘣𝘪𝘤 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘥𝘦𝘥.

It makes it VERY difficult to believe this is genuine concern about Bluesky being an echo chamber. She's not guilty by association that some transphobes agree with the surface level read of her opinion. But when she REPOSTS those agreements? It seems clear that's who she's supporting.