The executive director of the website that accused Palestinian photojournalists of knowing about the Oct. 7 Hamas attack in Israel in advance says it had no evidence to support that claim The report led Israeli politicians to suggest the journalists be killed. apnews.com/article/isra...
I too put the word "reporting" in my websites where I just post batshit conspiracy theories. Doesn't mean I claim to be reporting news or anything.
Everything about this situation show a lack of humanity
How republican of them
Shocking. Regardless, even if they had prior knowledge, they still wouldn't have had any obligation to publicize it. That would expand the definition of "complicity" to include most civilians in Gaza… oh wait.
Did they actually accuse, or did they raise the question of real-time early-morning reporting of the Hamas breach that they deemed suspicious? Here’s the report. I don’t think it makes the overt accusation that some are claiming. honestreporting.com/photographer...
On October 7, Hamas terrorists were not the only ones who documented the war crimes they had committed during their deadly rampage across southern Israel.
It's not true explains the Guardian. Nothing about Benny Gantz saying 'they should be killed'.
But Phil the people who accepted that as true are so serious and thoughtful
So you can just speculate your way into murders there? They sound even dumber than the judges in The Crucible.
"Just asking questions" is the new "I pulled it out of my ass"
Despite the name "Honest Mechanics", we don’t claim to be a repair shop.