1/ The anarchist would start by say ing that the injunction against assault is a social/moral injunction, not a legal one. In other words, whether there’s a law or not is immaterial.

If it’s a social norm that’s been broken, you don’t need a judge (but you can elect one if you like). Rather, the arbiter is society, and society has to reckon with itself, not have a third party ‘decide’ according to some law no one wronged ever wrote. This ‘transformative justice’