"While the State’s interest in protecting 'unborn' life is compelling, until that life can be sustained *by the State* -- and not solely by the woman compelled by the Act to do the State’s work -- the balance of rights favors the woman."
It’s so blatant, too. Neither of them even try to hide that they’re doing this.
Just a week after both Meta & Google promised Senators that they would never block a potentially embarrassing story related to a candidate for national office, both companies did just that. Apparently the promise only applied to embarrassing info on GOP candidates. www.techdirt.com/2024/09/30/b...
It probably will not shock you to find out that big tech’s promises to never again suppress embarrassing leaked content about a political figure came with a catch. Apparently, it only applies when …
Doesn't it depend on the venue a bit? It seems like an incredibly dull writing world where "said" replaces "exclaimed," "shouted," "stated," "shared," "murmured," "reported," and countless others. . .
Remember how cancel culture was a national crisis because online mobbing with harsh words was a dire threat to free speech? Anyway, this man in Ohio, plus his family, are getting mobbed with death threats because he said that people Trump and Vance are viciously lying about are good workers
latest victim of the two minute hate www.nytimes.com/2024/09/30/u...
The lifelong Republican employs fewer Haitians than others in Springfield, but his life has been upended since Donald J. Trump spread falsehoods about immigrants in his hometown.
People can yell at me on here if they want, but the problem ppl unfamiliar with traffic enforcement keep creating is thinking automated enforcement works on people who do not pay fines and don’t have valid tags. These are the folks most in need of enforcement and a camera doesn’t do it.
Is this something I should say to federal investigators when they come knocking? @kenwhite.bsky.social
A federal judge has ruled that parts of the Texas voter security law SB1 is unconstitutional, and Texas can no longer investigate voter assistance efforts as a criminal act.
The judge ruled on Saturday that Texas can no longer investigate alleged cases of illegal vote harvesting. He said the state law is too vague and restrictive.
Tl;dr this is a story of good governance and leaders working hard to do the right thing for all citizens. Basically the opposite of what the republicans would do.
The three state officials learned a computer glitch meant 98,000 voters had not provided proof of citizenship. In a candid phone call, they debated what to do.
The three state officials learned a computer glitch meant 98,000 voters had not provided proof of citizenship. In a candid phone call, they debated what to do.