but in this case, hard to sugarcoat it: if just four years after the biggest electoral crime in modern US history, you see the world's richest man go on TV offering to straight up buy votes for a million dollars and you think it's "too political" to shut it down, what is the fucking point of you
He’s a federal contractor. You shouldn’t even need Justice, simply tear up the contracts or better yet nationalize the relevant parts of his empire.
It is indeed political, that's... that's the point, YOU are political did you forget that
It’s possibly even scarier to realize that if it went to the Supreme Court they would likely not only allow it but set precedent that it’s OK.
"it's too political" yeah!! that's the problem!!!! there is not an apolitical way to break this particular law!!!!!
like at this point they aren't just breaking the law, they are loudly and openly flouting it; and encouraging other lawlessness from other people along the way. It is not political to intervene to stop it; it is misconduct not to.
Keeping the seat from being held by someone who'd do the gig
I’d probably wait until November 6 to arrest him. You really don’t want a public indictment to do the work his dumb criminal scheme couldn’t.
Well said.