We argue that this makes sense, since wealth is a minority interest, and "traditional" forms of participation are usually inherently more robust to minority influence. It thus makes sense for the wealthy to turn away from these.

Using detailed Swedish register data on wealth and participation in a discordant twin design, we find the opposite: if anything, wealth seems to have a negative effect on some forms of participation, and null effects on voting.

Thanks! I'm not sure i'm the right person to do that, but I know there are others with similar views writing on this topic :)

Have not tried the latter, but it's giving me ideas!

Definitely a regular occurrence for me. I've tried to overcorrect in the other direction with my attire, but it feels weird.

Very interesting!