Of course. I never do that as editor and Iāve never seen editor do that. But of course we all have limited exposure to the world of peer review. I agree multiple experiments does raise costs by increasing standards for ārobustnessā. Which affects what gets submitted, before editors/reviewers engage
Of course. My only (sarcastic) point was that itās not a waste of money if you prefer to support the consulting industry as opposed to the research/teaching industry. And admin allegiances are a topic of much debate!
Interesting stuff. I like frank tone to writing. Iām most persuaded by arguments abt samples. Multiple experiments seem useful + I thought best practice for editors was never assign R&Rs conditional on more data collection. Pre-reg always seemed silly to me. Doesnāt hurt but not big deal either way.
Bad thing for who? Itās certainly good for the consulting class. And university admins may be closer to that world than the faculty world.
New @apsa.bsky.socialpreprints.apsanet.org/engage/apsa/...
Political science has witnessed an explosion in the use of experiments. In response, authors, reviewers, and journal editors have sought to devise best practices for experimental work by promoting (i)...
Tabea Palmtag, @DominikSchraff and I have a new paper forthcoming at @bjpols.bsky.social in which we ask: How do voters react to place-based appeals, such as in these pictures? We find a strong asymmetry: while rural voters appreciate rural appeals, urban voters strongly dislike urban appeals 1/9
Best not to think too deeply about this manās words. A great philosopher he aināt. But always reliably bizarre and odious.
Roasting some peaches and MY GOODNESS the apartment smells divine. God in a fruit indeed.
š”In recent years, anti-refugee hate crimes have soared across Europe. ā”ļøE. Kuhn & @rahsaanmax.bsky.socialcambridge.org/core/journal...#FirstView#OpenAccess
College football is among the most exploitative and harmful institutions in the US. Coaches, AD officials, presidents, and members of the sports media complex richly benefit as players bear the life-altering costs. Our solution? Abolish it. For @thenation.comwww.thenation.com?post_type=ar...
NCAA football, especially at major universities, is among the most exploitative and harmful institutions in the United States.