3. In contrast to mainstream media, coverage of alternative medium @nachdenkseiten.de was rather one-sided while @RT_Deutschland remained more diverse than @nachdenkseiten.de. More findings and their discussion in the paper. Please also note the Erratum posted on the researchgate linked at the top.3. In contrast to mainstream media, coverage of alternative medium @nachdenkseiten.de was rather one-sided while @RT_Deutschland remained more diverse than @nachdenkseiten.de. More findings and their discussion in the paper. Please also note the Erratum posted on the researchgate linked at the top.

2. Coverage was not quite as one-sided as critics claimed. This was particularly true for the assessment of the Corona measures, indicating a considerable degree of both external and internal diversity (Fig. 4).

1. The media reported very heavily at the beginning of the pandemic. Significantly higher numbers of infected and dead in winter 2020/21 did not increase coverage proportionately (Fig.2).

🥇Sophia Rothut mit Anna-Luisa Sacher, Rebecca Strohmeier & @reinemann.bsky.socialdoi.org/10.5771/2192...

Sounds super interesting.