RG
Roger Giner-Sorolla
@rogerthegs.bsky.social
Social psychology Professor at University of Kent in England. Moral emotions, collective apologies, scientific reporting reform, ironic enjoyment, and more. Opinions are my own and do not represent any employer.
1.1k followers787 following939 posts
This is not surprising if you pay close attention to the results of Festinger and Carlsmith, 1957. Three DVs, one significant, two not, with the discussion explaining why the significant measure was the best one all along.
Indeed. Others voiced some pretty strong criticism around that time about it. Here's a quote from Chapanis & Chapanis (1964):
Yeah but after they wrote the article they found it much more plausible
RG
Roger Giner-Sorolla
@rogerthegs.bsky.social
Social psychology Professor at University of Kent in England. Moral emotions, collective apologies, scientific reporting reform, ironic enjoyment, and more. Opinions are my own and do not represent any employer.
1.1k followers787 following939 posts