Wow. I did not expect that but it was truly excellent. Thank you.

But I think that indicates they haven’t found a new home, is my guess. At the end of the day, people go where the people they want to talk to (or at) are.

Do you publish “making of” videos? The end result art is one thing but the craft of creating it has to be similarly fascinating.

Zelda countdown!

Who decided on “skeet”? That shit sucks so bad. Seriously. Embarrassing stuff. Serious adults call it a “bloop” or “blooping”.

I hate “skeet” enough to get behind this. Let’s go.

Yes! My question is still if it provides verification. Moderation will still have to be done to make sure it's the real '@nytimes.com' and not '@nуtimеѕ.cоm' (lot of Cyrillic chars in that second one).

Nice!

Just had only seen vanity domains used for namespace flexibility. This is the first domain I recognize used as a username to prove a connection with that original site. Nice to see it play out. Would love to see someone verify subdomains for staff or something.

For the time being, it's almost like BlueSky only exists in relation to Twitter. Majority of my timeline is about new features or old best tweets or whatever.