Me too, but there is a range of bad things, which are not at all speculative (as you “hypo” is so far), many of which have been treated as normal. That doesn’t make this less bad. It just raises the familiar problems of distinguishing and limiting as well as selecting what to care about when.

Thanks. I pointed to this “hypo” because it was raised repeatedly during oral arguments at the dc circuit and scotus and is helpful in identifying the boundaries of what the Court’s ruling allows.