you realize nyt editorial board has endorsed every candidate that has run against trump and has repeatedly called trump unfit for office....? "this man we called a 'demonstrably unsuited for the office of president as any to run in the long history of the Republic'... he's also too old"

oh and by all means, post through this! just keep posting, it'll help.

like if your call here is that these are equivalent, i mean, fine. (they're not, but i can't stop you from saying that.) but if your contention is that "asides about trump are the same as a Huge Fucking Declarative Piece by the Editorial Board", well. i mean, well.

oh sarah, quote-tweeting sarah, simple q for you: then why didn't they write the same article about trump. wouldn't have been hard!

You realize Maggie Haberman gave Trump prostate massages for 4 years, right?

Hunter Biden’s drugs versus Kuchners $2b Saudi bride. 42 sexual harassment suits. The RS broke story of all his demands to kill protestors. Not the NYT, no news there. Why the fuck are Clinton’s emails fair game for publishing for years but the Trump hack gets NOTHING. I could list out another 100

Who gives a shit about their endorsement when they’ve run 30000 SaneWashing front page articles on his behalf and deep-sixed every negative thing they could about him. From the $10m Egypt bribe to that pesky stealing of National secrets that his hand picked maga judge dismissed. Nope. No NYT there.

Do we really have to give you a full statistical analysis of sentiment in NYT news stories. “But her emails” is shorthand for public opinion skewed by bad reporting for very good reason.