Credeam că doar cei de la Adevărul sunt suficient de tonți să-i dea portavoce acestui g̵u̵r̵u̵ ̵e̵c̵o̵n̵o̵m̵i̵s̵t̵ gurist: quo vadis, Hotnews? hotnews.ro/puteti-sa... Dacă *ascultați* ce vorbește, ce date are, ce inferențe face, e mare probabilitatea să... vă pișați pe voi de râs.
„Va crește TVA clar, că este cel mai simplu, cu 2 puncte procentuale (n.red. de la 19% la 21%), vor mai pune niște taxe pe aici-pe acolo, și vor îngheța de
Their Section 7. is indeed super insightful, with the conclusions of that section relevant way beyond the problem in context (and even beyond the discipline)! arxiv.org/abs/2410.0...igorpak.wordpress.co...
That's exactly where costs can and should be negligible in—ideal—academe: if one is willing to say smth. about someone's research (e.g., as peer-reviewer, but it needn't be confined to that role), one ought to be willing to state/ argue it PUBLICLY. Nay? Then one should STFU. x.com/sbuhai/status/...
À bon entendeur, salut ! (with those not able to disentangle proximate from ultimate causes particularly advised to follow through the entire thread below... ) x.com/sbuhai/status/...
Editor in Chief Nature Dear Editor, Thank you for obtaining three helpful reviews of our manuscript. We appreciate the enthusiastic assessment from reviewers 1 and 3. While we appreciate the thoughtful critique from reviewer 2, however, the rules were you guys weren’t going to fact check…
I’d say that her randori starts to look promising! #mylittlejudokax.com/sbuhai/status/...