Editorial boards: We all have the right to free speech but some should be arrested for their speech while others can't even be criticized

"Speech is only free for those that can afford it."

Also: the sitting president should be allowed to do any crime. But not *this* president.

Why is it always OK to tolerate bullying and pro Nazi speech, but not to advocate for human rights? Seems very one-sided to me. (Almost like "free speech" is code rather an actual idea)

🎯

Just so long as neither group is shamed or shunned.

"Free speech doesn't apply to counterspeech."

Some speech is more free than others, it seems

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. Frank Wilhoit

“We get to say the N word but you don’t get to express your disgust about that”

“Advocating against a wannabe dictator who then tried a coup was excessive”