Fun fact (as far as I can tell, anyway): the record for shortest time from discovery to Nobel is held by a woman (well, two women). en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennife...
We do not have a "marginal efficiency" problem. We have a "we need an entirely new thermodynamic mechanism" problem.
To be more precise: every Prius sold commits us to 20+ more years of fossil fuel extraction. The combustion engine ecosystem does not even BEGIN dying until the last ICE is sold. Every day we wait to kill ICE is another nail in our own coffin. Econ-brained marginal impact analysis ignores this.
This is complete horseshit.
Yeah, Trump has at least two more cycles in him before the Alzheimer's stops him from swallowing.
Literally nothing to do with what we're talking about.
I used the gender neutral "they" to indicate an unspecified third person. "Good guy" is also an ungendered expression.
It's not a mistake. Using normal english words is not an error.
If you were to intentionally misconstrue the meaning of a person's words in order to score points at someone else's expense, you are absolutely being unreasonable.
What gives you the right to declare an organic linguistic folkway illegitimate?