I think in some fields we are at 50% unreliable research (not only fraud), so we can just cancel those fields at this point.

I don't think of an adversary, more of a monkey with a grenade, you can sometimes sweet-talk a monkey with a banana

This prize is what stirrs the negative dynamics with reliability of findings in our field and beyond.

Russia is a terrorist state.

Sure i hope someone else might. Just don’t want to log into X to figure it out. The type of ‘argument’ is sadly familiar.

Who is this subtweeting?

This assumes they simply made honest mistakes

I am sorry I was not trying to do neither. I will not bother you going forward. Thanks.

No unfortunately that is assigned to scientific disagreement and does not lead to retractions. You are then invited to write a comment, or a matters arising in this case.

I mean theoretically yes it can be retracted in this case, but I do not know examples of this. Can you share? In my experience no matter how terrible the flaws I need to find a hidden piece before getting a retraction. The hidden piece is often not the main problem.