I mean literally yes this. This is the problem here, when people mean the first, blue sky straw man the second. This is the precise motte and bailey that folks do all day around here. I could not have said this better. Of course you can go nutpicking and find someone who means the second.
if they unseat Ted Cruz I will play a free solo show in Austin and the set list will include Golden Boy, Riches & Wonders, Comandante and whatever other oldschool bangers ppl want
Alright, bragging time. Before Elon takes it away, go to Twitter and screencap a quality block and repost.
An authoritarian demagogue inspiring crowds to demand the expulsion of a group of nonwhite legal residents based on their nationality. Could not be more explicit what we're seeing here.
Bro needs to tone down the rhetoric, too many bullet flying around
Maybe he's got some crazy Google skills but eight seconds dude? bsky.app/profile/benc...
I mean, I get it, I'm not going to defend everything Bari Weiss publishes - the just asking questions folks have abused a lot of good faith over the last few years, But the unifying factor that I get out of blue sky is the need to take a "shoot on sight" approach to anybody who might resemble this
Now for Kelly, all I've seen is that she tweeted an article by someone who questioned the liberal use of hormone treatment for children. I'm not go to drill down into everything this means but "I haven't seen anything compelling that she's not a transphobe" is the attitude I'm talking about
OK, let's start with NYT. I don't need to go nut picking here - just put in NYT into the search and look at "top". Any day of the week this is going to be full of claims are trying to help Trump win or sanewashing or bothsidesing. Many many likes zero pushback.