BLUE
Profile banner
DS
👻 Desperately Shrieking Susan 👻
@susanrinkunas.com
Reporter: abortion & politics. Contributing writer, Jezebel. Seen in Slate, The New Republic, The Nation, The Guardian, and more. @wgaeast.bsky.social council. From PA, now in BK. ❤️‍🔥 linktr.ee/susanrinkunas 💌 susanrinkunaswrites @ gmail
6.8k followers1.1k following3.5k posts
DSsusanrinkunas.com

Republicans want to ban abortion *and* make it harder to get birth control. Project 2025 would not only end no-cost insurance coverage of emergency contraception, it would also make it easier for employers to exclude insurance coverage of ANY contraceptive www.americanprogress.org/article/proj...

Project 2025 Would Take Away Access to Free Emergency Contraception for 48 Million Women
Project 2025 Would Take Away Access to Free Emergency Contraception for 48 Million Women

A new state-by-state analysis estimates that 48 million women would lose guaranteed access to no-cost emergency contraception if the Project 2025 agenda were implemented.

1

DSsusanrinkunas.com

Expanded employer exclusions is in second photo. Project 2025 would also gut a birth control program for people without insurance called Title X by excluding clinics that even *make referrals* for abortion (first photo) www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/h...

Guttmacher screenshot 

guttmacher
DONATE
MENU =
6. Attacks on Contraception
Project 2025 seeks to severely undermine two cornerstones of US contraceptive provision: Title
X, the national publicly funded family planning program, and the federal contraceptive coverage guarantee of the Affordable Care Act.
• The plan proposes reinstating the harmful
"domestic gag rule,'
" which would prohibit
health care providers who receive Title X funding from providing abortion referrals and would require them to be physically and financially separated from any abortion-related activities, including counseling. Within about a year of this policy going into effect in 2019 (before it was rescinded in 2021), hundreds of clinics left the program and the number of patients served dropped by 2.4 million.
Guttmacher screenshot

Project 2025 goes further and recommends legislation that would prohibit Title X funding from going to entities that perform or help fund abortion care. Legislating such a policy makes it harder to reverse in the future (compared with administrative rulemaking);18 it would also disqualify providers who meet the gag rule's already stringent requirements.
• In addition, the plan calls for broadening the contraceptive coverage guarantee's existing religious and moral exemptions to make it easier for any employer-including large, for-profit corporations-to exclude contraceptive coverage from their employees' health plan. 19 Such exemptions deny people reproductive autonomy and access to needed health care, while over a decade of evidence show that the
coverage guarantee reduced patients' costs and helped them to use the birth control method of their choice and to use it effectively.
7 Imart on Renroductive Health
1
Profile banner
DS
👻 Desperately Shrieking Susan 👻
@susanrinkunas.com
Reporter: abortion & politics. Contributing writer, Jezebel. Seen in Slate, The New Republic, The Nation, The Guardian, and more. @wgaeast.bsky.social council. From PA, now in BK. ❤️‍🔥 linktr.ee/susanrinkunas 💌 susanrinkunaswrites @ gmail
6.8k followers1.1k following3.5k posts