I genuinely encourage you to read the article, by the way. It's not going to poison your mind. If you don't like it, you can ignore it You complained and I'm trying to be helpful

I have read that article before. I understood what you were saying before but found the language willfully obtuse, which annoys me.

I’ve read it back in the day it’s his usual nonsense providing cover for his engagement with reactionary views by pretending it’s radical openness rather than simply favoring the reactionary views.