If the problem with SRM is not scientific, no amount of scientific research is going to make the least bit of difference. I conclude therefore that research into the specifics of SRM mainly serves to advance the probability of deployment of an unworkable 'solution'.

Here's what they say: "Annual emissions in China are forecast to fall through 2050 and decline either 7.2% or 8.2% this year.... Coal-fired electricity generation slumped for a second straight month in June and declined 7.4%"

Yes, I think it's been shown for a while now that transportation is a ridiculously small part of food production emissions. All the more so by boats. ourworldindata.org/food-choice-...

You want to reduce the carbon footprint of your food? Focus on what you eat, not whether your food is local

“Eat local” is a common recommendation to reduce the carbon footprint of your diet. How does the impact of what you eat compare to where it's come from?

Thanks!

Depends on which communities are active there. Climate twitter never really moved there, unfortunately.

Ok, this site definitely gets a plus for being able to set my own domain as my handle. 👍