Beyond his familiar vague denial, can we discuss his (quite intentional) framing of our bodily autonomy as a binary choice between woman & family. His “pro-family” language is mirrored in Project 2025, where they inextricably link our rights & societal value to the noble sacrifice of motherhood

Last night was the closest he’s come to reciting the P2025 Handbook verbatim, even if hiding draconian policy in innocuously titled legislation is their SOP. But what JD said last night gave him away: He doesn’t see the Dobbs backlash as consequence of bad policy—he thinks it’s just bad BRANDING.