"rumors and tea leaves"? what on earth are you talking about?www.politico.com/news/2024/09/30/us-israel-military-hezbollah-00181797
oh well, nevertheless
"it's not my job to educate you"
I hope that Phil Gordon or whoever is telling you off the record that there is no regional war, that sounds like a nice world to live in
ok, if you've decided answering what I wrote isn't your job, that's your right, but again: you'll understand if I don't consider your non-argument to be an argument
"the legacy of the 1968 convention" do you think I don't understand that? that's why I'm hung up on it.
Meanwhile, how many countries are going to burn while "we're just going to have to wait"? Why is it forbidden to consider Phil Gordon's recent statements as evidence? Or Halie Soifer's?
People can read the pieces and judge for themselves. But your thread here offers nothing to give me even the slightest bit of pause.
There are a number of specific points in the piece you don't respond to here. For example: what is your explanation of why Harris wouldn't meet the most minimal demands (e.g. meet with Palestinian-Americans)? "Wait and see, we just don't know" is *not* an answer to that direct question.