BLUE
Login
Profile banner
TE
Tobias Egner
@tobiasegner.bsky.social
Professor of Psychology & Neuroscience at Duke University. Studying cognitive control, loving lots of other stuff. www.egnerlab.org
589 followers253 following33 posts
OverviewPostsReplies
Reposted by Tobias Egner
SBsebraem.bsky.social

I've been recommending this review by @tobiasegner.bsky.socialwww.nature.com/articles/s44...@musslick.bsky.socialwww.nature.com/articles/s44.... (1/7)

1
Reposted by Tobias Egner
Smehr.nz

this is pretty amazing: @lucinauddin.bsky.socialwww.lieffcabraser.com/antitrust/ac... summary of the case:

The Publisher Defendants’ Scheme has three primary components. First, the Publisher Defendants agreed to not compensate scholars for their labor, in particular not to pay for their peer review services (the “Unpaid Peer Review Rule”). In other words, the Publisher Defendants agreed to fix the price of peer review services at zero. The Publisher Defendants also agreed to coerce scholars into providing their labor for nothing by expressly linking their unpaid labor with their ability to get their manuscripts published in the Publisher Defendants’ journals. In the “publish or perish” world of academia, the Publisher Defendants essentially agreed to hold the careers of scholars hostage so that the Publisher Defendants could force them to provide their valuable labor for free.
Second, the Publisher Defendants agreed not to compete with each other for manuscripts by requiring scholars to submit their manuscripts to only one journal at a time (the “Single Submission Rule”). The Single Submission Rule substantially reduces competition among the Publisher Defendants, substantially decreasing incentives to review manuscripts promptly and publish meritorious research quickly. The Single Submission Rule also robs scholars of negotiating leverage they otherwise would have had if more than one journal offered to publish their manuscripts. Thus, the Publisher Defendants know that if they offer to publish a manuscript, the submitting scholar has no viable alternative and the Publisher Defendant can then dictate the terms of publication.
Third, the Publisher Defendants agreed to prohibit scholars from freely sharing the scientific advancements described in submitted manuscripts while those manuscripts are under peer review, a process that often takes over a year (the “Gag Rule”). From the moment scholars submit manuscripts for publication, the Publisher Defendants behave as though the scientific advancements set forth in the manuscripts are their property, to be shared only if the Publisher Defendants grant permission. Moreover, when the Publisher Defendants select manuscripts for publication, the Publisher Defendants will often require scholars to sign away all intellectual property rights, in exchange for nothing. The manuscripts then become the actual property of the Publisher Defendants, and the Publisher Defendants charge the maximum the market will bear for access to that scientific knowledge.
11
TEtobiasegner.bsky.social

For fans of *Cognitive Controversies* -> my comments on others’ comments on my opinion! TLDR: I propose to unyoke the constructs of cognitive stability and flexibility; others disagree; we argue politely... Free read links: rdcu.be/dTxqbrdcu.be/dTxql

0
TEtobiasegner.bsky.social

Interested in cognitive stability and flexibility? Alright then: @RaphaelGeddert and I investigate contextual factors determining whether stability and flexibility tradeoff. Free read link: rdcu.be/dTvTIlink.springer.com/article/10.3...

0
TEtobiasegner.bsky.social

A fun project with @eren_gunseli and his gang, now out in J Neuro: Effects of Context Changes on Memory Reactivation www.jneurosci.org/content/44/3...

Effects of Context Changes on Memory Reactivation
Effects of Context Changes on Memory Reactivation

While the influence of context on long-term memory (LTM) is well documented, its effects on the interaction between working memory (WM) and LTM remain less understood. In this study, we explored these...

0
TEtobiasegner.bsky.social

I would say either is fine. The important thing is bringing across that you know the kind work being done there and have ideas on how your own research connects with it in interesting ways. Good luck!

1
Reposted by Tobias Egner
DVdvsmith.bsky.social

Please share and repost: Postdoc position in my lab at Temple University. Review of application begins on 8/19/2024 and continues until the position is filled. neurostars.org/t/postdoc-po...

Postdoc position at Temple University
Postdoc position at Temple University

The Neuroeconomics Lab at Temple University (PI: David Smith; Neuroeconomics Laboratory – Principal Investigator: David V. Smith, Ph.D.) invites applications for a full-time Postdoctoral Associate (st...

0
Reposted by Tobias Egner
FDfelipedebrigard.bsky.social

I am looking for a new lab manager and SSNAP project coordinator. Please share this ad! #neuroskyence#science#philosophywww.imclab.org/lab-manager-...

CURRENTLY HIRING | IMC Lab
CURRENTLY HIRING | IMC Lab

0
Reposted by Tobias Egner
CGclairegillan.bsky.social

We are taking applications for a 3-year POSTDOC position on the topic of tracking cognitive dynamics using passive smartphone sensor data, in clinical and non clinical samples with the Neureka app gillanlab.com/join-the-lab/ Closing June 1st. Pls share 🔁👍 or reach out with any informal queries!

Join the Lab
Join the Lab

We're hiring! Postdoctoral Fellowship: Predictive Models for Cognitive Fluctuations  Closing date: 12 noon (IST), June 1st 2024 We are seeking a Research Fellow to pioneer the development of passive s...

1
TEtobiasegner.bsky.social

Here's a free reading link: rdcu.be/dFVcg

0
Profile banner
TE
Tobias Egner
@tobiasegner.bsky.social
Professor of Psychology & Neuroscience at Duke University. Studying cognitive control, loving lots of other stuff. www.egnerlab.org
589 followers253 following33 posts
HomePopularExplore